Coservation targets & threats
In accordance with the PAPF planning methodology adopted for this planning process, the Nature Conservancy’s Conservation Action Planning (CAP) methodology has been used to help identify the Ecological Management Programme’s management objectives and actions. The CAP methodology provides a mechanism for focusing ecological management by enabling the identification and development of an accurate definition and understanding of the area’s most significant ecological features, and the major threats to these features. This methodology has been now been applied in many conservation areas around the world, and it is based on the premise that, with limited human and financial resources available to managers, it is impractical to attempt to manage and monitor every single aspect of the complex ecology of an area, and management effort is therefore best focused on a limited number of the area’s most important features.
The CAP methodology involved the initial identification of a limited number of “conservation targets”, which represent and encapsulate the unique biodiversity contained within the MMNR, or the ecological features that require specific management actions (such as particularly endangered species or habitats). The definition and understanding of each of these targets was further elaborated through the subsequent identification of the “key ecological attributes” (KEAs), upon which the long-term survival of each conservation target depends. This laid the foundations for the identification of the “threats” to these targets and attributes, and the subsequent prioritisation of these threats according to their significance.
The nine MMNR conservation targets, important subsidiary targets (i.e. other ecosystem components that share KEAs and threats with the conservation target concerned), and the KEAs for each target are set out below, with the the priority threats to the MMNR conservation targets and their KEAs.
graphic
graphic
graphic