Many molecules, including amino acids, have
isomers that are left-handed (levorotatory) or right-handed
(dextrorotatory). When amino acids are formed in the laboratory,
about half are right-handed and half are left-handed. But in living
things, this is not the case. Almost all amino acids used by living
things are left- handed. Perhaps there is some as yet unidentified
process in living things that favours the formation of these
molecules over their right-handed counterparts. Or perhaps the very
formation of living things was fostered by left-handed molecules
that formed when our solar system formed.
Many of the organic compounds on Earth are
believed to have derived from meteorite impacts. Some meteorites
are rich in organic compounds. The Murchison meteorite is the most
recently observed and studied of the organic meteorites known to
have hit Earth. A study of the organic compounds in this meteorite
has produced some surprising results. More of the amino acids in
the Murchison meteorite are left-handed than right-handed. Some of
the amino acids in the meteorite show a preponderance of
left-handedness, whereas others show just a slight increase in
left-handedness.
What does this mean? Some scientists hypothesize
that life could not have originated on Earth without an abundance
of left- handed amino acids. Because there are more left- handed
than right-handed compounds in living things as well as in
organically rich meteorites, some scientists suggest that life on
Earth may have derived from the compounds that were formed in
space. It is possible that the molecular cloud from which the solar
system condensed produced a preference for left-handed compounds.
How this occurred is still unknown. Some scientists hypothesize
that a preference for left-handed compounds was imposed on the
solar system by a nearby neutron star that caused light to be
polarized in a circular pattern (causing compounds to form with
distinct handedness). If this happened, then scientists looking for
life elsewhere in the solar system may examine rocks from other
planets to determine if they, too, have greater numbers of left-
handed chemical compounds.
A preference for the left or right hand is shown
by humans and many other species, including mammals, birds, and
amphibia. In the case of the human, the preference first appears
several months before birth and can be recognised on ultrasound
scanning.
Approximately 5-8% of babies are born left-
handed and the remainder right-handed. How these preferences arise
is a topic of continuing discussion, but clues have been found in
studies of embryos and even in the structure of biological
molecules such as proteins.
Vertebrate embryos are considered to have a
symmetrical arrangement when they begin development, so the
question could be expanded into how and when embryonic symmetry is
broken and then how preferential handedness arises somewhat later
in development. The first physical signs of asymmetry in the embryo
have been detected at the primitive streak stage - for example, the
node region at the future cranial end of the streak in chick
embryos is deviated to the left, and in mouse embryos the cilia of
cells lining the node beat in an anticlockwise pattern. It is
proposed that this early asymmetry may be a result of the
‘handedness’ (chirality) of the molecules that drive
the cilia, and result in a cascade of events which produce
asymmetric development of the internal organs. Subtle asymmetries
in gene expression have also been detected in early embryos before
any morphological differences become apparent: two genes called
nodal and lefty are expressed only on the left side
of the midline.
Although the human body has a symmetrical
appearance when viewed externally, many of the internal organs are
arranged asymmetrically. So for example the heart is biased to the
left, and the liver to the right, while the right kidney is
positioned lower than the left kidney. Occasionally, someone is
born in whom all the asymmetries are the other way round, a
mirror-image arrangement which is called situs inversus.
This occurs in about 1 in 10,000 people. Complete reversal like
this does not necessarily create any additional problems for the
person. It is interesting that in conjoined twins who are joined at
the thorax or abdomen, one of the twins will show situs inversus.
This probably results from cross-signalling between the two
primitive streaks in the embryonic disc. However, if there is only
a partial reversal of position, as for example when the heart is
biased to the right (dextrocardia) and all the other organs are in
their usual positions, then clinical problems can arise because of
the changed inter- relationships within the body. In mouse embryos,
a mutation in the gene called inv causes situs inversus, and
is associated with a reversal of the normal distribution of
nodal and lefty. It is becoming clear that the
asymmetries of the body are tightly controlled by genes that have
been conserved during evolution, and are implemented by cascades of
signalling molecules.
The preference for a particular hand appears to
be linked with an asymmetry in the brain that controls it. It has
been found that the regions of the cerebral cortex which control
each upper limb do indeed differ in volume by about 7%. Thus, in
right-handed people the left somatomotor cortex controlling the
right upper limb is about 7 % larger than the corresponding cortex
of the right side of the brain (motor pathways to the limbs cross
the midline), although it is difficult to decide whether this
difference is causing the preference or a result of the
preferential use of one hand. There is also evidence for a link
between hand preference and speech: in most people, the speech
centre is located in the left cerebral hemisphere, the same side as
the cortex controlling the preferred hand. Thirty percent of
left-handed people have their speech centre located in the right
hemisphere (only 5% in right-handers).
So, internal asymmetries arise early in embryonic
development, perhaps triggered by preferred molecular
configurations and/or genetic events, and in some way lead to
behavioural bias in the use of the upper limbs several months
before birth.