Thinking is associated with material changes and
activities in the brain and the connected nervous system. This
promulgates the brain-behaviour notion. According to this notion,
all aspects of human behaviour and experiences are functions of a
material structure, the brain. Who one is, is determined by his or
her brain. Nevertheless, many people continue to believe in a
'higher power' that guides and controls human action and behaviour.
In a sense, religion and spirituality was developed to understand
and explore questions about 'who we are' and 'what is the purpose
of life'.
Whether one is Christian, Jewish, Muslim,
Buddhist or Hindu, religious thinking and belief attempt to ground
human experiences and thoughts in the spiritual and ethereal.
Religious experiences are considered 'otherworldly' and not
material. Heightened spiritual behaviour through prayer, meditation
or yoga is considered to lead to a state of 'transcendence', 'inner
peace' or a 'nearness to God' depending on which faith you follow.
Hence, the notion of spirituality and religion is based on an
ethereal component. However could the ethereal and spiritual be
embodied by a material structure, the brain? Recent scientific
research has provided observations, which suggest spirituality, and
religious experience has a biological basis. Scientific
observations suggest there are specific physiological aspects to
spiritual behaviour like meditation, prayer, and yoga.
According to Newberg, the 'human brain is
genetically wired to encourage religious beliefs''. Spiritual
experiences like transcendence and inner peace, through meditation
and prayer are increased by the activities and interactions of the
different areas of the brain and neural networks.
Therefore, is there any 'biological' purpose to
such behaviour, if spiritual behaviour and experiences are linked
to a material structure, the brain, and the nervous system? Are we
literally made for reflection and spirituality? According to
Newberg, spirituality has an evolutionary function. The
brain was evolutionary developed for exploring spirituality and
religious behaviour. He argues that spiritual experiences
like meditation, and sexual experiences such as arousal and orgasm,
though unquestionably not the same experience nevertheless involves
similar changes/activities in the neural networks and the
brain.
These findings on the material nature of
spiritual experiences have created a lot of controversy as well as
heightened interest in the society. Many argue that by the
machinery of neurobiology of faith, spirituality, religion, and
'God' is dismissed as mere chemical reactions occurring in the
brain.
In addition to the studies conducted on
accomplished practitioners of spiritual behaviour, observations of
patients of temporal lobe epilepsy has revealed specific hyper
sensitivity to religious and spiritual behaviour. All
these findings could make atheists and sceptics argue that religion
and spirituality are only a dysfunction of the brain.. However, is
it possible that it is in reality a 'function' and not a
dysfunction of the brain activity?
The activities of the brain and the corresponding
nervous system are highly complex and there is still much ambiguity
about the actual functioning of the brain. Each brain is supposed
to contain approximately hundred billion neurons, which form
complex and highly integrated communication networks of hundred
trillion neurons. Some can therefore argue that the workings
of the still much unexplored and misunderstood 'gray matter' is
influenced by an unexplained ethereal power. There are clearly many
limitations to the still infant study of biology of spirituality
and faith. For instance, the association of certain spiritual
behaviour with brain activity does not specify why some people are
more religious and spiritual than others. Nevertheless, these
studies produce an important dialogue between science and religion,
which can be useful to explore questions about life, behaviour etc.
They also advocate an important ground to think about spirituality
and religion, irrespective of differences in faith.