Action 2.1 Revenue sharing
As one of the major MMNR benefit sharing mechanisms, the Narok and Trans Mara County Councils
presently distribute 19 percent of MMNR entry fee collections to surrounding communities under a revenue
sharing programme. The initial geographic scope of this programme was defined by the range of the annual
large mammal migrations, which essentially restricted payments to the eight group ranches that originally
surrounded the Reserve. Eligibility to the scheme was however expanded in recent years to include all wards
in the districts that are not practicing large-scale wheat farming (in line with the recommendations in the
Ministries of Local Government and Tourism & Wildlife “Masai Mara Task Force31).
Although 19 percent of entrance fees represents a significant proportion of the revenues generated by the
MMNR, both the geographic scope of the revenue sharing programme and the mechanisms used to distribute
the funds have been criticised by many community members, especially those residing in areas close to
the Reserve where the costs of conservation through wildlife-human conflicts are highest. As a result, many
community members feel that the revenue sharing programme is not achieving its desired goal of improving
community livelihoods and increasing community support for the MMNR, and that the programme needs
to be restructured, in particular with regard the amount of funds distributed, its geographical scope, and the
process used to distribute funds to address community needs. In this regard, the MMNR Community Working
Group proposed that ward-level committees should be established to oversee the disbursement of funds,
possibly linked with existing committees such as Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plan (LASDAP)
or Local Authority Transfer Fund (LATF), and that these mechanisms should include provisions to ensure
accountable, transparent management of projects funded from MMNR revenue sharing.
31 Report on the Management of National/Game Reserves under the Mandate of Local Authorities. Ministry of Local Government and
Ministry of Tourism & Wildlife, April 2005.
This action addresses this concern expressed by the community, by undertaking a study of the performance
of the revenue sharing programme over the past five years, with particular attention to the aspects detailed
above – i.e. amount of funds invested, programme scope, and mechanisms for addressing priority community
needs. Because such a study is outside of the mandate of MMNR managers, it will be commissioned by
the two concerned county councils in close association with the responsible section in the Ministry of Local
Government, for implementation by an independent evaluator. The recommendations emerging from this
evaluation will be subsequently implemented by the two county councils, subject to the endorsement and
approval of the councils and the Ministry of Local Government. The overall aim should be to revise the
revenue sharing programme as appropriate to ensure that it is fully appreciated by the community, and
makes a substantial contribution towards the overall purpose of this Programme – i.e. developing strong
community support for and pride in the MMNR.